Krishnakumar on The Modern Way To Run SaaS
The era of installing software from a CD or from a datacenter’s server is coming to a close, as internet-delivered software makes applications available anywhere, anytime.
How SaaS is delivered
As with other cloud services, organizations typically pay for SaaS through a subscription fee, on a monthly or annual basis. This contrasts with the traditional model of paying for software through a perpetual license, with an upfront cost and optional ongoing support fee.
SaaS providers usually price applications based on some type of usage parameters. For example, they might charge based on the number of people using the application, the number of transactions, or some other measure of usage.
Users typically access the applications using a web browser; in some organizations, they may also use a thin-client terminal.
"Among the top reasons for using SaaS is it saves organizations from installing and running applications on their own systems"
Most SaaS offerings are based on a multitenant architecture, in which a single version of an application is used for all the service provider’s customers.
Organizations using SaaS applications can change configuration settings and customize the software, within certain parameters, to meet their particular needs. But they can’t customize its code or features to the same degree that is sometimes possible for enterprise software they install locally on users’ PCs or provide from their own datacenters.
How SaaS can save enterprises money
Among the top reasons for using SaaS is it saves organizations from installing and running applications on their own systems. That eliminates or at least reduces the associated costs of hardware purchases and maintenance and of software and support. The initial setup cost for a SaaS application is also generally lower than it for equivalent enterprise software purchased via a site license.
Sometimes, the use of SaaS can also reduce the long-term costs of software licensing, though that depends on the pricing model for the individual SaaS offering and the enterprise’s usage patterns. In fact, it’s possible for SaaS to cost more than traditional software licenses. This is an area IT organizations should explore carefully.
SaaS also provides enterprises the flexibility inherent with cloud services: They can subscribe to a SaaS offering as needed rather than having to buy software licenses and install the software on a variety of computers. The savings can be substantial in the case of applications that require new hardware purchases to support the software.
The pay-as-you-go model of payment lets enterprises shift costs to an ongoing operating expense (aka opex) for easier-to-manage budgeting. They can stop subscribing to SaaS offerings whenever they want and thus stop those recurring costs.
The risks and challenges of SaaS
SaaS comes with a set of risks and challenges that enterprises need to be aware of to maximize the benefits of the delivery model.
Similar to other cloud services, users of SaaS rely on their service providers to be up and running at all times so that they can access applications as needed. They also depend on the providers to ensure that the software is kept up to date in terms of new features, security patches, and other changes.
Although SaaS providers take great measures to ensure continuous uptime and availability, even the largest vendors can experience unexpected interruptions in service. Companies that use SaaS can expect to lose some level of control when it comes to accessibility, which is one of the trade-offs of cloud computing in general.
This loss of control can extend to other areas, such as when a service provider adopts a new version of an application but an enterprise is not ready to make such a change or doesn’t want to incur the costs of training users in the new version.
If enterprises decide they want to switch to a new SaaS provider, they might confront the difficult task of moving extremely large files over the internet to the new provider. By contrast, changing locally deployed software usually doesn’t change the location of the files, which tend to reside in the enterprise’s own datacenter.
Security and privacy are also issues, as they are with other cloud services. If a service provider experiences a data breach that can compromise safety of the enterprise’s data and the availability of the services.
Other potential risks relate service quality and user experience. Despite improvements in networking technology, because SaaS applications might be hosted far from where users are located, there can be latency issues that affect response times for applications.
Many organizations do not have a broad cloud strategy, and this has led to a rise in business users acquiring SaaS applications on their own - without the knowledge of IT - to fill in gaps that exist. That can lead to wasteful spending, poor data management, and extra work to move processes and data from one non-integrated system to another.
SaaS vendors and the trend to greater integration
Among the leading enterprise SaaS providers are ADP, Adobe Systems, Box, Citrix Systems, Dropbox, Google, IBM, Intuit, Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce.com, SAP, ServiceNow, and Workday. But hundreds of companies offer their software as SaaS, from mobile management tools to expense report management, from video transcoding to financial calculations, from customer data cleanup to computer-aided design (CAD).
Because SaaS offerings can come from so many providers, a key trend is the rise in integration among vendor offerings. There are both services meant to integrate multiple SaaS applications, such as to provide single sign-on and access management across them, and efforts within the SaaS vendor community to create integrations across multiple providers’ software so enterprise processes can flow more easily across those applications sourced from multiple providers.